<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Yle vs. Urheilukanava</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.nordicfootball.info/2008/09/21/yle-vs-urheilukanava/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.nordicfootball.info/2008/09/21/yle-vs-urheilukanava/</link>
	<description>Football News from Finland, Sweden and Norway.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Sep 2010 02:17:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Juha Salminen</title>
		<link>http://www.nordicfootball.info/2008/09/21/yle-vs-urheilukanava/comment-page-1/#comment-1651</link>
		<dc:creator>Juha Salminen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Sep 2008 16:23:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://footballinfinland.wordpress.com/?p=724#comment-1651</guid>
		<description>I am know nothing about professional TV, mind you, so I don&#039;t know what&#039;s really good graphics. But I found Urheilukanava graphics informative enough. There&#039;s nothing wrong with the studio that I spot, either. But maybe it&#039;s just me.

I had no problem with the commentary, but I just think Virkkunen is best suited. Your idea about having Virkkunen and Ennekari share the job is a good one too, but I think Virkkunen can pull it off all by himself if he needs to. The atmosphere at the stadia is not too good, so the commentators must be enthusiastic enough to keep the viewer interested and Virkkunen has loads of enthusiasm.

As for the signal, I cannot possibly comment. I live in Turku and never have problems with Urheilukanava, but if it does not work properly in some areas it is an issue. But I believe the digital network is getting better all the time, though I&#039;m not an expert.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am know nothing about professional TV, mind you, so I don&#8217;t know what&#8217;s really good graphics. But I found Urheilukanava graphics informative enough. There&#8217;s nothing wrong with the studio that I spot, either. But maybe it&#8217;s just me.</p>
<p>I had no problem with the commentary, but I just think Virkkunen is best suited. Your idea about having Virkkunen and Ennekari share the job is a good one too, but I think Virkkunen can pull it off all by himself if he needs to. The atmosphere at the stadia is not too good, so the commentators must be enthusiastic enough to keep the viewer interested and Virkkunen has loads of enthusiasm.</p>
<p>As for the signal, I cannot possibly comment. I live in Turku and never have problems with Urheilukanava, but if it does not work properly in some areas it is an issue. But I believe the digital network is getting better all the time, though I&#8217;m not an expert.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Watcher</title>
		<link>http://www.nordicfootball.info/2008/09/21/yle-vs-urheilukanava/comment-page-1/#comment-1650</link>
		<dc:creator>Watcher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Sep 2008 14:36:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://footballinfinland.wordpress.com/?p=724#comment-1650</guid>
		<description>In retrospect I have to agree about the studio and it can be pretty much lumped together with the pre and post match analysis situation (doesn&#039;t remove the fact that the Urheilukanava studio looks really bad as do their graphics). But otherwise as far as the professionalism goes specifically regarding the production quality, aside the missing studio parts, is leagues above Urheilukanava.
I&#039;ve been quite satisfied with Urheilukanava camera work, but I do think YLE was much better at it.

And while I agree that Virkkunen should be the default commentator at least in big matches it can get a little grating to have the same guy in every match week in week out. Ideally he would be in every other week and in the big matches while a commentator like that of last sunday should do the rest.

The biggest problem Urheilukanava has is weak signal coverage at best outside of cities and atleast in Helsinki cable network they have some serious problems at times in signal quality as well (it is unwatchable at times, UK are the only channel that has these problems in Helsinki).

I genuinely hope these problems can be solved so that a larger audience can enjoy Urheilukanava in the future.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In retrospect I have to agree about the studio and it can be pretty much lumped together with the pre and post match analysis situation (doesn&#8217;t remove the fact that the Urheilukanava studio looks really bad as do their graphics). But otherwise as far as the professionalism goes specifically regarding the production quality, aside the missing studio parts, is leagues above Urheilukanava.<br />
I&#8217;ve been quite satisfied with Urheilukanava camera work, but I do think YLE was much better at it.</p>
<p>And while I agree that Virkkunen should be the default commentator at least in big matches it can get a little grating to have the same guy in every match week in week out. Ideally he would be in every other week and in the big matches while a commentator like that of last sunday should do the rest.</p>
<p>The biggest problem Urheilukanava has is weak signal coverage at best outside of cities and atleast in Helsinki cable network they have some serious problems at times in signal quality as well (it is unwatchable at times, UK are the only channel that has these problems in Helsinki).</p>
<p>I genuinely hope these problems can be solved so that a larger audience can enjoy Urheilukanava in the future.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Juha Salminen</title>
		<link>http://www.nordicfootball.info/2008/09/21/yle-vs-urheilukanava/comment-page-1/#comment-1649</link>
		<dc:creator>Juha Salminen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Sep 2008 13:54:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://footballinfinland.wordpress.com/?p=724#comment-1649</guid>
		<description>finnbritt, thanks for the praise. Autumn fixtures are somewhat problematic indeed. I think the main reason they play on Sundays at 6:30 is because so many people go to their summer cottages for the weekend during the warmest months. The games then kick off late in the hope that the cottage people will be back in town by that. From September on the temperature for some people is cold enough for them not to show up. I guess you need a table-topping team, and in the case of Inter or Honka even that does not seem to help. Finns are gloryhunters.
In the previous years they have played the last few rounds on Saturdays, but now it seems they stick to Sunday. The reason they don&#039;t play on Saturdays in June or July is because of the cottage people again. I don&#039;t think the abscence of cottage people would cause a dramatic change, but that&#039;s what they seem to think at Veikkausliiga.

Watcher, I agree with you that the camera work was OK, but I don&#039;t think the change was very dramatic. I&#039;ve been fairly satisfied with Urheilukanava in that sense.
The commentator was OK, can&#039;t disagree with you on that. YLE would have worse options. However, putting Virkkunen aside for no particularly good reason is something I can&#039;t understand.
Have to disagree with you as far as the professionalism goes though. I already mentioned some points in the post, but as for the graphics, they were OK. Except not necessarily very well prepared, the Lahti line-up was shown twice because Jukka Veltheim had been marked down as a goalkeeper in the first version.
And the studio...well, if Yle had gotten their share of the infamous Ostrobothnian autumn wind, the &quot;studio&quot; would have ceased to exist in a matter of minutes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>finnbritt, thanks for the praise. Autumn fixtures are somewhat problematic indeed. I think the main reason they play on Sundays at 6:30 is because so many people go to their summer cottages for the weekend during the warmest months. The games then kick off late in the hope that the cottage people will be back in town by that. From September on the temperature for some people is cold enough for them not to show up. I guess you need a table-topping team, and in the case of Inter or Honka even that does not seem to help. Finns are gloryhunters.<br />
In the previous years they have played the last few rounds on Saturdays, but now it seems they stick to Sunday. The reason they don&#8217;t play on Saturdays in June or July is because of the cottage people again. I don&#8217;t think the abscence of cottage people would cause a dramatic change, but that&#8217;s what they seem to think at Veikkausliiga.</p>
<p>Watcher, I agree with you that the camera work was OK, but I don&#8217;t think the change was very dramatic. I&#8217;ve been fairly satisfied with Urheilukanava in that sense.<br />
The commentator was OK, can&#8217;t disagree with you on that. YLE would have worse options. However, putting Virkkunen aside for no particularly good reason is something I can&#8217;t understand.<br />
Have to disagree with you as far as the professionalism goes though. I already mentioned some points in the post, but as for the graphics, they were OK. Except not necessarily very well prepared, the Lahti line-up was shown twice because Jukka Veltheim had been marked down as a goalkeeper in the first version.<br />
And the studio&#8230;well, if Yle had gotten their share of the infamous Ostrobothnian autumn wind, the &#8220;studio&#8221; would have ceased to exist in a matter of minutes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Watcher</title>
		<link>http://www.nordicfootball.info/2008/09/21/yle-vs-urheilukanava/comment-page-1/#comment-1648</link>
		<dc:creator>Watcher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Sep 2008 21:55:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://footballinfinland.wordpress.com/?p=724#comment-1648</guid>
		<description>While I agree with you about the pre and post match analysis being pathetic on YLE compared to Urheilukanava, there are quite a few things YLE did much better than urheilukanava.

1. Camera work was worlds beyond what Urheilukanava has ever come even close to achieving. For once the match was well shot and directed (Much better than last year on YLE as well).

2. The commentator was actually quite good, he was calm and didn&#039;t make factual errors or the mistake that something needs to be said all the time no matter what (Reminded me of British commentators actually). Granted he was very different from Virkkunen, but that&#039;s not always such a bad thing.

3. The whole package had a professional feel about it including how the graphics and stuff didn&#039;t look like they were from the seventies or that the studio is made from cardboard boxes.

I just hope Finnish TV could combine best of both worlds the professonialism of YLE on the production and shooting side with the deeper analysis and genuine enthusiasm of Urheilukanava.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While I agree with you about the pre and post match analysis being pathetic on YLE compared to Urheilukanava, there are quite a few things YLE did much better than urheilukanava.</p>
<p>1. Camera work was worlds beyond what Urheilukanava has ever come even close to achieving. For once the match was well shot and directed (Much better than last year on YLE as well).</p>
<p>2. The commentator was actually quite good, he was calm and didn&#8217;t make factual errors or the mistake that something needs to be said all the time no matter what (Reminded me of British commentators actually). Granted he was very different from Virkkunen, but that&#8217;s not always such a bad thing.</p>
<p>3. The whole package had a professional feel about it including how the graphics and stuff didn&#8217;t look like they were from the seventies or that the studio is made from cardboard boxes.</p>
<p>I just hope Finnish TV could combine best of both worlds the professonialism of YLE on the production and shooting side with the deeper analysis and genuine enthusiasm of Urheilukanava.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: finnbritt</title>
		<link>http://www.nordicfootball.info/2008/09/21/yle-vs-urheilukanava/comment-page-1/#comment-1647</link>
		<dc:creator>finnbritt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Sep 2008 21:13:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://footballinfinland.wordpress.com/?p=724#comment-1647</guid>
		<description>first of all , love your blog , its excellent !
maybe you could bring this subject up in one of ur articles, its the fact that playing league games on sunday evenings at 6.30 is maybe not beneficial to anyone involved. i drag myself to the odd vps game  , dire is the only word i find, same as watching at fc lahti, even hjk .
sunday evening, people are winding down , planning for monday  maybe travelling back to placs of study ( as is my case ,  )  watching football as the temperature plummets is maybe the reason one can hear a pin drop at most games .

is there a reason why games cant be played on saturday afternoons ? and has it always been so ,because 5 years ago i seem to remember there being a different schedule!

also over the years i have noticed the demographics of supporters change . vps games used to be packed with the children of the junior teams , nowadays they are scarce and the old men become more apparent .
the needs of fanbases need to be met and catered for .
sorry for going on and on , but its something i feel strongly about and before things change for  the better off the field .( and on)  i will continue to dread the veikkausliiga experience.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>first of all , love your blog , its excellent !<br />
maybe you could bring this subject up in one of ur articles, its the fact that playing league games on sunday evenings at 6.30 is maybe not beneficial to anyone involved. i drag myself to the odd vps game  , dire is the only word i find, same as watching at fc lahti, even hjk .<br />
sunday evening, people are winding down , planning for monday  maybe travelling back to placs of study ( as is my case ,  )  watching football as the temperature plummets is maybe the reason one can hear a pin drop at most games .</p>
<p>is there a reason why games cant be played on saturday afternoons ? and has it always been so ,because 5 years ago i seem to remember there being a different schedule!</p>
<p>also over the years i have noticed the demographics of supporters change . vps games used to be packed with the children of the junior teams , nowadays they are scarce and the old men become more apparent .<br />
the needs of fanbases need to be met and catered for .<br />
sorry for going on and on , but its something i feel strongly about and before things change for  the better off the field .( and on)  i will continue to dread the veikkausliiga experience.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
